Haemophilic arthropathy: Diagnosis, management, and aging patient considerations.

Gene therapy and universal use of safer, more effective, and personalised prophylactic regimens (factor, and nonfactor) are expected to prevent joint bleeding and promote joint health in persons with haemophilia (PwH). Growing evidence suggests that subclinical bleeding, with active and inactive synovial proliferation, continues and haemophilic arthropathy remains a major morbidity in PwH despite early institution of joint prophylaxis. Joint health assessment is evolving with physical examination scores complementing imaging scores. Point-of-care ultrasound is emerging as a safe, cost-effective, and readily available tool for acute determination of musculoskeletal abnormalities, serial evaluation of joints for sonographic markers of haemophilic arthropathy, and in providing objective insight into the efficacy of new therapies. In acute haemarthrosis, arthrocentesis expedites recovery and prevent the vicious cycle of bleed-synovitis-rebleed. When synovial proliferation develops, a multidisciplinary team approach is critical with haematology, orthopaedics, and physiotherapy involvement. Synovectomy is considered for patients with chronic synovitis that fail conservative management. Non-surgical and minimally invasive procedures should always be offered and considered first. Careful patient selection, screening and early intervention increase the success of these interventions in reducing bleeding, pain, and improving joint function and quality of life. Chemical synovectomy is practical in developing countries, but radioactive synovectomy appears to be more effective. When surgical synovectomy is considered, arthroscopic/minimally invasive approach should be attempted first. In advanced haemophilic arthropathy, joint replacement and arthrodesis can be considered. While excited about the future of haemophilia management, navigating musculoskeletal challenges in the aging haemophilia population is equally important.

Stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF-1alfa) and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP): Two potential signature biomarkers of radiological detectable hemophilic arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia is a rare constitutional bleeding disorder due to a deficiency in Factor VIII or Factor IX. Recurrent hemarthroses, one of the major complications of the disease, lead to hemophilic arthropathy, a disabling condition that requires early diagnosis. Traditionally, clinical examination and plain film radiography have been used to diagnose hemophilic arthropathy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound can be more useful for diagnosing soft-tissue changes. However, but each of these methods has limitations and diagnosis of arthropathy can be delayed. AIM: The aim of this project was to assess plasmatic biomolecules indicative of osteo-cartilaginous damage in patients with hemophilia with or without known arthropathy, in order to improve the diagnosis of this major complication of the disease. METHODS: In this monocentric retrospective study, 40 patients with hemophilia A or B, for whom a plasma sample was available, provided informed consent for further analyses (multiplex immunoassays and ELISA) and collection of relevant clinical information in their medical files. Correlations were sought for between biomarkers of interest and the severity of joint lesions assessed according to Pettersson's radiologic score. RESULTS: Two biomarkers were identified, respectively SDF-1α and COMP. Their plasmatic levels were significantly increased in patients with arthropathy compared to controls and patients without arthropathy. These values correlated significantly with the Pettersson score in patients under regular prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Two plasma biomarkers have been identified that could help assess the presence and severity of hemophilic arthropathy.

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B.

BACKGROUND: Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

The utility of standing knee radiographs for detection of lipohemarthrosis: comparison with supine horizontal beam radiographs.

OBJECTIVES: Lipohemarthrosis is a key finding in acute trauma patients and indicates an intra-articular fracture. The horizontal beam lateral radiography with supine position is known to be the best technique to demonstrate knee lipohemarthrosis. Our main purpose was to compare the sensitivity of supine and standing lateral knee radiographs to detect lipohemarthrosis. METHODS: In our retrospective study, consecutive patients with lipohemarthrosis on computed tomography of the knee between October 2019 and September 2021 were included. Fractured bone, the presence of lipohemarthrosis, and image quality in both standing and supine anteroposterior and lateral knee radiographs were evaluated. Interobserver reliability of the three observers was calculated. Fisher exact chi-square and z-proportion tests were used to compare lateral and anteroposterior knee radiographs. Krippendorff's Alpha and Kappa coefficients were used for inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients (38 men [62.3%], 23 women [37.7%]; mean age, 43 years ± 17 [standard deviation]) were included. The most common type of fracture was isolated tibial fractures (n = 32; 52.5%). The sensitivity of showing lipohemarthrosis of standing lateral knee radiographs (95.5%) was higher than supine lateral radiographs (38.5%) (p < 0.001). While non-optimal image quality did not affect lipohemarthrosis detection on lateral radiographs (p > 0.99), it caused a significant decrease in the diagnosis of lipohemarthrosis on anteroposterior radiographs (p = 0.036). We found a good-excellent interobserver agreement in lipohemarthrosis detection. CONCLUSIONS: Standing lateral radiographs have higher sensitivity than supine lateral radiographs in detecting lipohemarthrosis and are beneficial for detecting lipohemarthrosis which indicates the presence of occult-evident intraarticular fracture in patients with knee trauma. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Standing lateral knee radiographs offer a useful method for reducing the misdiagnosis of the occult intra-articular fractures by showing the fat-fluid leveling more clearly. Its advantages may be more prominent when the advanced imaging modalities are limited. KEY POINTS: • Fat-fluid level (lipohemarthrosis) is an important radiographic sign to assess patients with acute trauma. It almost always indicates an intra-articular fracture. • Our retrospective study results support that lipohemarthrosis sign could be observed more frequently in standing lateral knee radiographs than in supine lateral radiographs. • Knee trauma patients, when available, should be evaluated with standing lateral radiographs for the diagnosis of lipohemarthrosis.

Skeletal complications in patients with hemophilia: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Arthropathy is a common complication in patients with hemophilia. We examined the prevalence of this skeletal complication in patients with hemophilia who were registered at a Comprehensive Hemophilia Center in Shiraz, Southern Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, an orthopedic specialist visited 448 patients and conducted screenings for skeletal complications. The assessment included evaluating the type of hemophilia, disease severity, treatment modality, the presence of inhibitors, and the identification of skeletal complications. RESULTS: Ninety patients with hemophilia A, with a mean age (SD) of 31.6 (14.4) years, and 10 patients with hemophilia B, with a mean age of 30.5 (20.6) years, were assessed. The most frequently affected joints were the knee and ankle joints. In the univariate analysis, patients with severe disease were more likely to exhibit synovitis, a target joint, and bone disease compared to patients with non-severe disease. Additionally, a history of treated or active hepatitis and an annual bleeding rate showed significant associations with the target joint. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, disease severity (OR 14.43, 95% CI 1.6-129.6) and a higher age at diagnosis (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.13) increased the likelihood of developing osteoporosis. A history of hepatitis (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.28-10.48) was identified as an independent risk factor for the target joint. CONCLUSION: Skeletal complications are a common occurrence in hemophilia. Regular consultations with orthopedic specialists, focusing on bleeding control and hepatitis prevention, are essential for reducing the impact of this debilitating complication.

Predicting the development of hemophilic arthropathy in patients with hemophilia based on patient age: a retrospective single-center database study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemophilia (PWH) develop hemophilic arthropathy of the major joints due to recurrent hemarthrosis. This study retrospectively estimated the age at which PWH may expect to develop hemophilic arthropathy and undergo joint replacement surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using retrospective data from PWH at a Czech orthopedic center, Kaplan Meier analyses were used to estimate the cumulative proportions of patients with hemophilic arthropathy and undergoing joint replacement surgery as a function of age. RESULTS: Based on 1028 joint examinations in 167 PWH, hemophilic arthropathy of the knees, elbows, ankles and hips was estimated to develop by a median age of 48, 51, 52 and 61 years, respectively, with ≈80% of patients having such damage by ≈70 years of age. Hemophilic arthropathy of the shoulder occurred much later (median >80 years). In patients undergoing knee or hip replacement surgery, hemophilic arthropathy of the knee and hip occurred at a median age of ≈50 and ≈60 years, respectively, with replacement surgery occurring at a median of ≈70 and >75 years. CONCLUSIONS: In PWH, the risk of developing hemophilic arthropathy accumulates continuously over the patient's lifetime, allowing predictions about the ages at which such damage and joint replacement surgery may occur.

The role of intraarticular injections of hyaluronic acid in joint pain relief in hemophilic arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain in hemophilic patients is due to joint degeneration associated with hemophilic arthropathy. In addition to appropriate hematological treatment (primary prophylaxis), pharmacologic management and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation should be indicated. When such measures are not sufficient, intraarticular injections (IAIs) of hyaluronic acid (HyA) may be considered. AREAS COVERED: In order to determine whether IAIs of HyA are effective in terms of pain relief in individuals with painful moderate hemophilic arthropathy, a PubMed and Cochrane Library search using 'hemophilia hyaluronic acid' as keywords was performed on 18 July 2023. EXPERT OPINION: In a study of individuals with hemophilic arthropathy (elbows, knees and ankles), 91% of them improved pain after a mean follow-up of 6 years. In another study of individuals with knee arthropathy, after a 7-year follow-up 82% reported an improvement in pain. As for hemophilic ankle arthropathy, in a study 67% of patients showed relief of joint pain at 6-month follow-up. Although the literature on the subject is very heterogeneous and difficult to interpret, it appears that IAIs of HyA can relieve the joint pain of painful moderate hemophilic arthropathy for months. Moreover, the IAIs can be repeated every 6-12 months.

Hemophilic arthropathy: how to diagnose subclinical bleeding early and how to orthopedically treat a damaged joint.

INTRODUCTION: It is important to know the current status of hemophilic arthropathy diagnoses, treatments, complications, and outcomes in developed countries. AREAS COVERED: A bibliographic search in PubMed for articles published from 1 January 2019 through 12 June 2023 was performed. EXPERT OPINION: In developed countries with specialized hemophilia treatment centers, primary hematological prophylaxis (started before the age of 2 years and after no more than one joint bleed) has almost completely eliminated the joint-related problems of the disease. The ideal goal of zero hemarthroses can be achieved only with intense and well-dosed prophylaxis: intravenous infusion of coagulation factor - standard half-life or extended half-life; periodic or subcutaneous injections of nonfactor products (emicizumab or fitusiran). However, hemophilic arthropathy continues to occur due to subclinical joint hemorrhages. In one study, 16% of the joints without reported hemarthroses showed signs of previous subclinical bleeding (hemosiderin deposits with/without synovial hypertrophy on magnetic resonance imaging were deemed signs of previous subclinical bleeding), rendering evidence for subclinical bleeding in people with severe hemophilia with lifelong prophylaxis treatment. Subclinical joint hemorrhages can be averted only by employing accurate and tailored prophylaxis.

Hemophilia Joint Health Score, Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia, and Pettersson Score in Pediatric Patients With Severe Hemophilia A.

Hemophilia is an X-linked recessive disorder. Children with hemophilia go through spontaneous and trauma-provoked bleeding. Recurring joint bleeds lead to ongoing incapacity. Achieving healthy joints is the primary target of hemophilia management. The current study objective was to assess hemophilic joints in individuals with hemophilic arthropathy clinically, radiographically, and functionally. This cross-sectional study included 50 children with severe hemophilia A who were selected from the pediatric hematology clinic. All children were assessed for Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Joint assessed functionally by Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH) and radiologically by plain radiograph and scored by the Pettersson scoring system. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The mean age of the studied cases of hemophilia was 8.5±3.1 years. The mean FISH score among the studied patients was 26.8±4.2, the mean HJHS was 16.8±12.8, and the Pettersson score was 4.9±2.7. The number of affected joints showed a significant negative correlation to the FISH score and a significant positive correlation to HJHS. The frequency of hemarthrosis/month showed a significant positive correlation to HJHS. The number of affected joints showed a significant negative correlation to the FISH score and a significant positive correlation to HJHS. Frequency of hemarthrosis/month showed a significant positive correlation to HJHS.

The hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis.

Prophylaxis is the gold standard treatment for children with haemophilia (CWH). MRI studies revealed joint damage, even with this treatment; this suggests the presence of subclinical bleeding. In the case of children with haemophilia, it is relevant to detect early signs of joint damage, as this allows the medical team to provide the appropriate treatment and follow-up, in order to avoid arthropathy development and its consequences. The aim of this study is to detect the hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis (CWHP) and analyse, by age group, which joint is the most affected. We define the hidden joint in CWH on prophylaxis as the joint that presents joint damage secondary to repetitive bleeding episodes and is detected in the joint evaluation, despite being asymptomatic or with mild symptoms. It is most commonly caused by repetitive subclinical bleeding. METHODS: This was an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study of 106 CWH on prophylaxis treated in our centre. Patients were divided according to age and type of treatment. Joint damage was defined as a HEAD-US score ≥ 1. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 12 years. All had severe haemophilia. The median age of onset of prophylaxis was 2.7. Forty-seven (44.3 %) patients received primary prophylaxis (PP) and 59 (55.7 %), secondary prophylaxis. Six hundred and thirty-six joints were analysed. Type of prophylaxis and joint involvement showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). However, patients on PP had a greater number of damaged joints at older ages. Twenty-two % (140) of the joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US. Cartilage was most frequently involved, followed by synovitis, and bone damage. We observed a greater frequency and degree of arthropathy in subjects aged 11 and above. Sixty (12.7 %) joints showed a HEAD-US score ≥ 1, with no history of bleeding. The ankle was the most affected joint, representing the hidden joint according to our definition. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis is the best treatment for CWH. However, symptomatic or subclinical joint bleeding may occur. The routine evaluation of joint health is relevant, particularly, of the ankle. In our study, early signs of arthropathy according to age and type of prophylaxis were detected by HEAD-US.

1H NMR metabolic profiling of synovial fluid from patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears and hemarthrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the metabolic profiles of synovial fluid (SF) from patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears and hemarthrosis (HA) with that of normal controls, using 1H NMR spectroscopy (NMRS). METHODS: Synovial fluid was collected from eleven patients undergoing arthroscopic debridement within 14 days following an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and hemarthrosis. Ten additional SF samples were obtained from the knees of osteoarthritis-free volunteers to serve as normal controls. The relative concentrations of twenty-eight endogenous SF metabolites (hydroxybutyrate, acetate, acetoacetate, acetone, alanine, arginine, choline, citrate, creatine, creatinine, formate, glucose, glutamate, glutamine, glycerol, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, lactate, leucine, lysine, phenylalanine, proline, pyruvate, threonine, tyrosine, valine, and the mobile components of glycoproteins and lipids) were evaluated using NMRS and quantified using CHENOMX metabolomics analysis software. Mean differences between groups were evaluated with t-tests controlling for multiple comparisons at an overall error rate of 0.10. RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in the levels of glucose, choline, the branched-chain amino acids leucine, isoleucine, and valine, and the mobile components of N-acetyl glycoproteins and lipids were observed in ACL/HA SF as compared with normal controls; lactate levels were reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Marked changes occur in the metabolic profiles of human knee fluid following ACL injury and hemarthrosis, suggestive of increased demand and accompanying inflammatory response; potentially increased lipid and glucose metabolism; and possible hyaluronan degradation within the joint following trauma.

Assessment of joint bleeding and target joints in patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B (factor IX ≤2%) receiving prophylaxis with rIX-FP in the PROLONG-9FP clinical trial program.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of prophylaxis with rIX-FP, a fusion protein linking recombinant factor IX (FIX) with human albumin, on joint outcomes. METHODS: Joint outcomes were assessed in pediatric (<12 years) and adult/adolescent (≥12 years) patients receiving rIX-FP prophylaxis every 7, 10, or 14 days; patients (>18 years) well-controlled on a 14-day regimen could switch to a 21-day regimen. Target joints were defined as ≥3 spontaneous bleeds into a single joint within a 6-month period. RESULTS: For adult/adolescent (n = 63) and pediatric (n = 27) patients, median (Q1, Q3) annualized joint bleeding rate was 0.39 (0.00, 2.31), 0.80 (0.00, 2.85), 0.20 (0.00, 2.58), and 0.00 (0.00, 1.78) when treated with 7-, 10-, 14-, or 21-day prophylaxis. 50.0%, 38.9%, 45.5%, and 63.6% of adult/adolescent patients had no joint bleeds when treated with 7-, 10-, 14-, or 21-day prophylaxis, respectively, and 40.7%, 37.5%, and 37.5% of pediatric patients had no joint bleeds when treated with 7-, 10-, or 14-day prophylaxis. Ten adult and two pediatric patients developed target joints; all resolved by the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis with rIX-FP produced low joint bleeding rates and provided excellent hemostatic efficacy in the treatment of joint bleeds. All target joints reported resolved with rIX-FP prophylaxis.

Chronic pain in haemophilia: assessment and analgesic treatment.

People with haemophilia tend to experience pain from an early age because of venipuncture and hemarthrosis. If pain is not properly managed, it can become chronic and bedevil patients throughout their lives. Therapies are currently available that have been shown to effectively treat the different types of pain and their causes. Patients with haemophilia tend to experience either nociceptive or mixed pain. Identification of the cause of pain by means of imaging techniques, and understanding the characteristics, location and intensity of the pain, are essential for a more targeted therapeutic approach. Current data reveal that the most effective measures are administration of haematological and analgesic medication, intraarticular injections, and physical exercise. However, multimodal strategies such as lifestyle changes, physical modalities, psychological support and orthopaedic surgery can also prove of use. This article will look at the most effective analgesic measures used as a part of conservative clinical treatment. Collaborative studies are needed to better understand the nature of pain in the context of haemophilia.

Orthopedic surgical procedures in people with hemophilia.

People with hemophilia tend to develop joint lesions secondary to the recurrent hemarthroses typical of their condition. These usually include chronic synovitis and arthropathy chiefly affecting their ankles, knees, and elbows. In addition, muscular hematomas, albeit less frequently, may also result in complications such as acute compartment syndrome, pseudotumors, bone cysts and peripheral nerve compression. Joint lesions may require some of the following surgical interventions: arthroscopic synovectomy (in cases of synovitis), arthroscopic joint debridement, radial head resection, opening-wedge tibial osteotomy, arthrodesis, arthrodiastasis (of the ankle), tendon lengthening (hamstrings, Achilles tendon), progressive extension of the knee by placing an external fixator in cases of flexion contracture of the knee, supracondylar femoral extension osteotomy in cases of knee flexion contracture and, eventually, a total joint arthroplasty when the affected joint has been destroyed and the patient experiences severe joint pain. Total knee arthroplasty in hemophilic patients is associated with a high infection risk (7% on average). As regards the complications following muscle hematomas, acute compartment syndrome requires urgent performance of a fasciotomy when hematological treatment is incapable of resolving the problem. Surgical resection of hemophilic pseudotumors is the best solution, with those affecting the pelvis (secondary to iliopsoas hematomas) being particularly difficult to resolve. Peripheral nerve lesions can often be effectively addressed with hematological treatment, although a surgical neurolysis of the ulnar nerve is indicated if nonoperative treatment fails.

A contemporary approach to the musculoskeletal problems associated with hemophilia.

ABSTRACT: It is essential that joint bleeds be treated in a hematologically and orthopedically optimal manner so as to arrest the bleeding as soon as possible and prevent potentially irreversible joint damage from setting in. The main goal of rehabilitation in the context of hemophilia is above all prevention and treatment of the consequences of musculoskeletal bleeding. Rehabilitation of acute joint bleeding episodes, that is, hemarthrosis, is based on three fundamental pillars: arthrocentesis, PRICE measures, and rehabilitation protocols.

Haemophilic arthropathy: basic protocols for clinical examination and imaging.

In haemophilia, screening protocols in the prevention and treatment of common lesions still require unification of criteria. Patients with haemophilia seek medical consultation exclusively for two reasons: because they have requested an appointment for a routine check-up (1-2 times a year in case of severe haemophilia) or because they have developed acute bleeding that requires treatment. The purpose of this paper is to emphasize the importance of an early differential diagnosis of joint damage and to review the techniques that allow an effective evaluation. The World Federation of Haemophilia recommends the 'Primary Prophylaxis' treatment modality, and today, severe haemophilia patients adhering to that factor VIII/IX therapy have significantly reduced common injuries: haematomas, haemarthrosis, synovitis, and haemophilic arthropathy. The basic protocols and minimum data for the control of musculoskeletal health are described. In summary, the primary goal of the haematologist-led multidisciplinary care team treating patients with haemophilia is likely to restore and/or preserve joint and musculoskeletal health, which is essential to promoting quality of life. Appropriate factor replacement regimens are required to prevent bleeding, these should be combined with physical activity and a physiotherapy program, in accordance with the recommendations of the World Health Organization for the general population.

What is the Effect of Bevacizumab on Cartilage and Synovium in a Rabbit Model of Hemophilic Arthropathy?

BACKGROUND: Hemophilic arthropathy can cause recurrent hemarthroses and severe damage to the synovium and articular cartilage. Previous studies have shown that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an essential role in neoangiogenesis. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal VEGF inhibitor, is used clinically to prevent angiogenesis. However, its effects on hemophilic arthropathy are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using a hemophilic arthropathy rabbit model, we asked: Does an intra-articular injection of bevacizumab (1) inhibit VEGF, (2) decrease signal intensity in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) as an assessment of capillary permeability and neoangiogenesis, (3) reduce cartilage damage, (4) reduce synovial changes, and (5) affect macroscopic changes during the development of hemophilic arthropathy? METHODS: Twenty-five male New Zealand rabbits were divided into four groups. Eight knees from four rabbits were used as the control group. We used an established animal model for hemophilic arthropathy in the remaining 21 rabbits. Animals were assigned randomly to three groups with seven rabbits in each group. One group was used to establish mild arthropathy, and the other two were used to establish severe arthropathy. Autologous blood from the rabbits' ears was injected into the right and left knees twice per week for 8 weeks to represent mild arthropathy and for 16 weeks to represent severe arthropathy. In the mild arthropathy group, bevacizumab was injected into the right knee once every 2 weeks. Bevacizumab was injected into the right knee of rabbits in one of the severe arthropathy groups once every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and intra-articular bevacizumab injections were administered to the right knees of rabbits in the other severe arthropathy group once every 2 weeks after the eighth week. An equal volume of 0.9% saline was injected into the left knee of rabbits in all arthropathy groups. To explore the efficacy of bevacizumab, joint diameters were quantitatively measured, and cartilage and synovial changes were examined. Degeneration of articular cartilage was evaluated with the semiquantitative Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading system. Synovial damage was analyzed with a semiquantitative microscopic scoring system. In addition, we evaluated perfusion and angiogenesis using DCE-MRI (quantitative signal intensity changes). Immunohistochemical testing was used to measure VEGF levels (analyzed by Western blotting). RESULTS: Intra-articular bevacizumab treatment inhibited VEGF in our rabbit model of hemophilic arthropathy. VEGF protein expression levels were lower in the mild arthropathy group that received intra-articular bevacizumab (0.89 ± 0.45) than the mild arthropathy control group (1.41 ± 0.61) (mean difference -0.52 [95% CI -0.898 to -0.143]; p = 0.02). VEGF levels were lower in the severe arthropathy group that received treatment for 16 weeks (0.94 ± 0.27) than in the control knees (1.49 ± 0.36) (mean difference -0.55 [95% CI -0.935 to -0.161]; p = 0.01). In the severe arthropathy group, the Osteoarthritis Research Society International score indicating cartilage damage was lower in the group that received intra-articular bevacizumab treatment from the beginning than in the control group (median 17 [range 13 to 18] versus 18 [range 17 to 20]; difference of medians 1; p = 0.02). Additionally, the scores indicated synovial damage was lower in the group that received intra-articular bevacizumab treatment from the beginning than the control group (median 5 [range 4 to 9] versus 9 [range 8 to 12]; difference of medians 4; p = 0.02). The mean of mean values for signal intensity changes was higher in the nontreated severe groups than in the group of healthy knees. The signal intensity changes were higher in the severe arthropathy control groups (Groups BC and CC) (median 311.6 [range 301.4 to 361.2] and 315.1 [range 269.7 to 460.4]) than in the mild arthropathy control group (Group AC) (median 234.1 [range 212.5 to 304.2]; difference of medians 77.5 and 81, respectively; p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). In the severe arthropathy group, discoloration caused by hemosiderin deposition in the cartilage and synovium was more pronounced than in the mild arthropathy group. In the severe arthropathy group treated with intra-articular bevacizumab, joint diameters were smaller than in the control group (Group BT median 12.7 mm [range 12.3 to 14.0] versus Group BC median 14.0 mm [range 13.1 to 14.5]; difference of medians 1.3 mm; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Hemarthrosis damages the synovial tissues and cartilage in the knees of rabbits, regardless of whether they are treated with intra-articular bevacizumab. However, intra-articular injection of bevacizumab may reduce cartilage and synovial damage in rabbits when treatment is initiated early during the development of hemophilic arthropathy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: If the findings in this study are replicated in larger-animal models that consider the limitations of our work, then a trial in humans might be appropriate to ascertain whether intra-articular injection of bevacizumab could reduce cartilage damage and synovial changes in patients with hemophilia whose hemarthroses cannot otherwise be controlled.

Synovitis in hemophilia: preventing, detecting, and treating joint bleeds.

INTRODUCTION: Most bleeding events in individuals with hemophilia occur within the ankle, knee, and elbow joints. Should the bleeding persist, the synovial membrane starts to hypertrophy and a vicious cycle of chronic hemophilic synovitis (CHS) occurs, leading to joint destruction. AREAS COVERED: This article covers the prompt diagnosis of CHS by point-of-care ultrasonography (POC-US) and its treatment by means of several types of synovectomy. EXPERT OPINION: It is essential to prevent, detect and treat hemophilic synovitis, because it indicates that the joint has bled and is at risk of bleeding further. Prophylaxis with standard half life (SHL) factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate is the standard of care for individuals with severe hemophilia A and can also be considered for selected patients with moderate disease. Several years of real-world experience with extended half life (EHL) FVIII, emicizumab, and other drugs in development will be needed to ascertain their final effect on bleeding and its complications. We must look for synovitis in individuals declaring joint pain and in asymptomatic patients, and POC-US is the most reasonable imaging instrument with which to carry out periodic joint screening. Radiosynovectomy, chemical synovectomy, and arthroscopic synovectomy markedly reduce bleeding events.